Humanoid Benchmark
Independent humanoid-robot index · Xodexa
XHI v2.0.0
← Back to the Humanoid leaderboard

🇯🇵 RHP Kaleido 9

Kawasaki Heavy Industries · Japan · unveiled 2025
prototype supervised-autonomy electric data confidence: medium
46.9
XHI Score
Rank #85 of 156 humanoid

Score breakdown

AutonomyManipulationMobilityHardwareCommercialEcosystem
Autonomy & Intelligence · 25%70.0
Manipulation & Dexterity · 20%72.5
Mobility & Locomotion · 15%0.0
Hardware & Engineering · 15%61.3
Commercial Readiness & Deployment · 15%38.0
Ecosystem & Viability · 10%0.0

Each pillar is scored 0–100 from published specs, then weighted into the XHI. Compare it only with other humanoid robots — each category uses its own reference scales. See the full methodology →

Notable

Ninth-generation Kaleido unveiled at iREX 2025 with reinforced waist/leg joints, a modular end-effector system, and LiDAR plus stereo cameras for SLAM-based navigation. It lifts up to ~18 kg and supports hybrid operation (autonomous walking with VR-headset remote control), aimed at a long-term roadmap toward disaster response.

Deployments & partners

  • Kawasaki KAWARUBA hub
  • Future Lab HANEDA

Specifications

Height
190.0 cm
Weight
99.0 kg
Payload
18.0 kg
Walking speed
Runtime
Battery
Total DoF
36
Hand DoF (per hand)
Dexterous hands
Yes
Actuation
electric
Form factor
bipedal
Onboard compute
Embedded real-time controllers; NVIDIA Isaac Sim for simulation
AI model
Physical AI, 3D LiDAR/stereo SLAM, simulation-based reinforcement/imitation learning, dynamic balance recovery
Indicative price
undisclosed
Company valuation

Embed this score

XHI score: 46.9

Change history · 1 applied update

  • Spec update Update RHP Kaleido 9
    ai_model: → Physical AI, 3D LiDAR/stereo SLAM, simulation-based reinforcement/imitation learning, dynamic balance recovery; onboard_compute: → Embedded real-time controllers; NVIDIA Isaac Sim for simulation; total_dof: → 36; dexterous_hands: False → True; deployments: → Kawasaki KAWARUBA hub, Future Lab HANEDA
    2026-08-29T21:48:13+00:00 · by agent-auto
Data confidence: medium. Some figures for this robot rest on single or conflicting sources, or on manufacturer/aggregator material rather than independent reporting. Treat second-order specs as approximate. Fields marked “—” were genuinely undisclosed and left blank rather than estimated.