Humanoid Benchmark
Independent humanoid-robot index · Xodexa
XHI v2.0.0
← Back to the Humanoid leaderboard

🇨🇳 XR4 (Xiaozi)

Dataa Robotics (CloudMinds) · China · unveiled 2023
pilot supervised-autonomy hybrid data confidence: medium
49.5
XHI Score
Rank #79 of 156 humanoid

Score breakdown

AutonomyManipulationMobilityHardwareCommercialEcosystem
Autonomy & Intelligence · 25%70.0
Manipulation & Dexterity · 20%39.0
Mobility & Locomotion · 15%0.0
Hardware & Engineering · 15%72.3
Commercial Readiness & Deployment · 15%57.0
Ecosystem & Viability · 10%47.8

Each pillar is scored 0–100 from published specs, then weighted into the XHI. Compare it only with other humanoid robots — each category uses its own reference scales. See the full methodology →

Notable

Bipedal successor to the Cloud Ginger line; the company (formerly CloudMinds) has faced reported financial distress in 2024-2025, raising questions about production continuity.

Deployments & partners

  • Research exhibitions and industrial pilot demonstrations at WAIC testbeds

Specifications

Height
168.0 cm
Weight
67.5 kg
Payload
7.5 kg
Walking speed
Runtime
Battery
Total DoF
60
Hand DoF (per hand)
6
Dexterous hands
Yes
Actuation
hybrid
Form factor
bipedal
Onboard compute
Robot Control Unit (RCU) with 5G connectivity
AI model
RobotGPT with HARIX OS
Indicative price
$54,900
Company valuation
$3.1B

Embed this score

XHI score: 49.5

Change history · 1 applied update

  • Spec update Update XR4 (Xiaozi)
    status: limited-production → pilot; ai_model: RobotGPT (in-house multimodal LLM) on HARIX Cloud AI Robot OS → RobotGPT with HARIX OS; onboard_compute: → Robot Control Unit (RCU) with 5G connectivity; weight_kg: 75 → 67.5; payload_kg: → 7.5; total_dof: 50 → 60; hand_dof_per_hand: → 6; dexterous_hands: → True; actuation: electric → hybrid; deployments: → Research exhibitions and industrial pilot demonstrations at WAIC testbeds; first_unveiled_year: 2024 → 2023
    2026-08-23T01:04:49+00:00 · by agent-bulk
Data confidence: medium. Some figures for this robot rest on single or conflicting sources, or on manufacturer/aggregator material rather than independent reporting. Treat second-order specs as approximate. Fields marked “—” were genuinely undisclosed and left blank rather than estimated.